The Science, the Who, the Why

     Treason Presentation

     Introduction

      Page 21 of 411

Is accepted academic science perfect providing accurate answers to most problems?

Science is taught with high regard as flawless, giving thought to it producing accurate results without need for further empirical experimentation. Most of this imperfect science hides behind the doors of engineers and scientists in the corporate environment in efforts to advance science and technology to the next level while maintaining its profitability. Much of academic science is flawed purposefully, some just wrong.

Science is taught with high regard as flawless, giving thought to it producing accurate results without need for further empirical experimentation. Most of this imperfect science hides behind the doors of engineers and scientists in the corporate environment in efforts to advance science and technology to the next level of prosperity and control to the true owners. Climate Change opened those doors, bringing light to some of the inadequacies of science theories taught in academia and its ability to reproduce real world accuracy with classroom formulas. What is exposed most was how wide the spectrum on scientific knowledge is in many cases is just scientific opinion, and not as intelligent as presumed.

[1] NOAA set up a lesson guide for children using 2 two liter bottles to explain the greenhouse effect, and Bill Nye foolishly narrated this experiment with ignorance. The experiment is empirically proven to be due to heat capacity and thermal conductance of the gases, with nothing due to infrared or greenhouse gas effect.

[2] NASA boldly states that hot air rises due to buoyancy causing the colder air to displace downward. The only force giving up or down direction is gravity and that is downward, there is no root force causing hot air to rise therefore it must be the cold air that displaces the hot air forcing it upward. NASA is wrong on science.

[3] Planck's Law is flawed to any real world application. If one calculated the supposed temperature of the sun by frequency or wave-number, it indicates the peak energy is in the infrared range, but in visible light by wavenumber. It is worse just than this.

[4] Blackbody is an academia classroom term that does not exist in the real world. Scientists use the term graybody but in reality, most all objects are non-graybody with emissivity varying with surface texture, temperature, and wavenumber. Gases do not emit at all with respect to a blackbody science and correlation to such is fools play.

[5] Peer review is nothing more than a censorship scheme. If the paper fails the agenda, it is rejected. Peer review is a criminal's process and only an idiot supports it as part of the scientific process as a scientist should have done his own validation with own proofing process. Most papers today are hypothetical toilet paper. Science is not a consensus!

Taught academic science is mostly nothing more than an introductory to a field. Much of science taught is at best approximation science requiring testing to create a final product.

Tim LeClair - "Religion is proof that as many as six billion people can be wrong"